arbiter
JournalsAccount

Supplemental Material for Do Individuals Selectively Apply Their Scientific Reasoning Ability When Communicating About Scientific Evidence on Polarized Topics?

Unknown author

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied2026https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000569.supparticle
AJG 4ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

No abstract available.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000569.supp

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Supplemental Material for Do Individuals Selectively Apply Their Scientific Reasoning Ability When Communicating About Scientific Evidence on Polarized Topics?}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000569.supp},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Supplemental Material for Do Individuals Selectively Apply Their Scientific Reasoning Ability When Communicating About Scientific Evidence on Polarized Topics?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.