Integrating Fairness in Machine Learning Development Life Cycle: Fair CRISP-DM

Vivek K. Singh & Kailash Joshi

E-Service Journal2022https://doi.org/10.2979/esj.2022.a886946article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.38

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Developing efficient processes for building machine learning (ML) applications is an emerging topic for research. One of the well-known frameworks for organizing, developing, and deploying predictive machine learning models is cross-industry standard for data mining (CRISP-DM). However, the framework does not provide any guidelines for detecting and mitigating different types of fairness-related biases in the development of ML applications. The study of these biases is a relatively recent stream of research. To address this significant theoretical and practical gap, we propose a new framework—Fair CRISP-DM, which groups and maps these biases corresponding to each phase of an ML application development. Through this study, we contribute to the literature on ML development and fairness. We present recommendations to ML researchers on including fairness as part of the ML evaluation process. Further, ML practitioners can use our framework to identify and mitigate fairness-related biases in each phase of an ML project development. Finally, we also discuss emerging technologies which can help developers to detect and mitigate biases in different stages of ML application development.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2979/esj.2022.a886946

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{vivek2022,
  title        = {{Integrating Fairness in Machine Learning Development Life Cycle: Fair CRISP-DM}},
  author       = {Vivek K. Singh & Kailash Joshi},
  journal      = {E-Service Journal},
  year         = {2022},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2979/esj.2022.a886946},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Integrating Fairness in Machine Learning Development Life Cycle: Fair CRISP-DM

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.38

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.09 × 0.4 = 0.03
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.