Approaching Qualitative Research as a Doctoral Candidate: Lessons to Deliberate

Craig J Selby

South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases2025https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779251389290article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Qualitative research can feel both exciting and overwhelming for doctoral candidates. It asks us to work with ambiguity, to be reflexive and to recognize that our own worldview shapes how we approach the research journey. This article shares lessons drawn from years of practice and mentoring, offering guidance on how candidates can navigate the personal, philosophical and practical sides of qualitative inquiry. Key themes include understanding positionality, defending methodological choices, exploring a range of qualitative approaches and recognizing the value of both creative and mixed methods. Along the way, I highlight the importance of planning carefully, preparing for the unexpected and staying personally involved in the research process. Ethics, emotional labour and the reality that we cannot ‘solve the world’ but can still make a genuine impact also feature strongly. Ultimately, this piece encourages doctoral candidates to see qualitative research as a journey—one that is messy, creative, sometimes frustrating but always rewarding. By embracing its challenges and opportunities, candidates can produce research that not only answers questions but also starts meaningful conversations.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779251389290

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{craig2025,
  title        = {{Approaching Qualitative Research as a Doctoral Candidate: Lessons to Deliberate}},
  author       = {Craig J Selby},
  journal      = {South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779251389290},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Approaching Qualitative Research as a Doctoral Candidate: Lessons to Deliberate

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.