More than a feeling: rapport and complex task performance in teams

Mary J. Waller et al.

Team Performance Management2025https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-04-2025-0052article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose This study aims to explore how the three constructs typically associated with rapport – positivity, mutual liking and interpersonal coordination – relate to performance in teams performing highly interdependent, complex tasks. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted two studies examining flight crew simulations using behavioral observation methodology. Findings Study 1 reveals that crews with higher levels of each rapport component during completion of a complex interdependent task perform better than crews with lower levels of these components. Furthermore, interpersonal coordination most strongly predicts both team- and expert-rated performance. In Study 2, the authors provide a micro-behavioral analysis of interpersonal coordination and demonstrate how crews reporting higher levels of coordination engage in significantly more complex interaction patterns as compared to crews reporting lower levels. Originality/value This research explores the role of rapport in demanding, time-pressured team settings.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-04-2025-0052

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mary2025,
  title        = {{More than a feeling: rapport and complex task performance in teams}},
  author       = {Mary J. Waller et al.},
  journal      = {Team Performance Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-04-2025-0052},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

More than a feeling: rapport and complex task performance in teams

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.