Revisiting dualism. The governance of the low pay-low skill labour market in four European countries

Werner Eichhörst & Gemma Scalise

European Journal of Industrial Relations2025https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801251397500article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The permanent restructuring of the economy, exacerbated by the digital transition and labour market dualization, is progressively increasing the risk of marginalization for semi- and low-skilled workers. This article analyses how Germany, France, Italy, and Spain balance employment and equality concerns in core private service sectors and examines the policy strategies implemented over the last decade for workers ‘at the margins’. The analysis considers multiple tools – skill upgrading, social benefits, incentives to reduce barriers to employment, and wage regulation – and reveals divergent trajectories. Germany and Spain share a common direction, adopting protective policies to mitigate long-standing labour market dualism and improve job conditions for low-wage and at-risk workers. France remains locked in a protective approach, prioritizing job stabilization through subsidies but neglecting skill development, which constrains long-term mobility. Italy, by contrast, exacerbates dualism by failing to improve job quality and training opportunities, resulting in persistent low productivity and rising in-work poverty.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801251397500

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{werner2025,
  title        = {{Revisiting dualism. The governance of the low pay-low skill labour market in four European countries}},
  author       = {Werner Eichhörst & Gemma Scalise},
  journal      = {European Journal of Industrial Relations},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09596801251397500},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Revisiting dualism. The governance of the low pay-low skill labour market in four European countries

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.