Driving ESG: Tax Policy and Electric Vehicle Incentives

Raquel Meyer Alexander et al.

ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research2025https://doi.org/10.2308/jltr-2024-010article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ABSTRACT Desiring improved air quality and reduced carbon emissions, federal and state governments have enacted legislation that encourages widespread personal use of electric vehicles (EVs). Policymakers often use tax incentives to encourage EV adoption, and we use this rich setting to explore multijurisdictional interactions between ESG objectives and tax policy. In this paper, we critically analyze the federal and state tax implications of purchasing personal-use EVs. We show that state-level variation in the incentive structure and administration of EV tax incentives can create adverse, unintended consequences for both governments and taxpayers. Specifically, rebates on EV purchases can result in significant tax consequences, particularly for lower-income taxpayers. The unintended consequences potentially limit efficacy and undermine the stated environmental and social goals of policymakers. We conclude our analysis with key considerations for future iterations of EV adoption policy. JEL Classifications: H23; H53; H71; K34.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jltr-2024-010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{raquel2025,
  title        = {{Driving ESG: Tax Policy and Electric Vehicle Incentives}},
  author       = {Raquel Meyer Alexander et al.},
  journal      = {ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jltr-2024-010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Driving ESG: Tax Policy and Electric Vehicle Incentives

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.