When sharing power leads to taking it back: A shift from empowering to directive leadership

Hsi‐Fang Lai & Shin‐Guang Liang

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology2026https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70088article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Leader behaviour shifts across days, and empowering acts may shape leaders' subsequent self‐regulation. Using a leader‐centric, within‐person lens, we test whether daily empowering leadership is associated with self‐regulatory demands and when such demands arise. Drawing on control theory, we argue that power sharing requires continual calibration to keep autonomy and accountability aligned and may coincide with higher day‐level regulatory strain indexed by leaders' self‐reported ego depletion. We further propose that this strain is more likely when subordinates are low in proactive personality, and that strain is associated with greater directive leadership the next day as a structured response. We tested these expectations in a 10‐day experience‐sampling study of 129 supervisor–subordinate dyads (719 observations) in a military setting. Multilevel lagged analyses showed a conditional pattern consistent with next‐day strain and the subsequent shift towards directive behaviour. These findings clarify when empowerment becomes harder to sustain and how leaders adapt by increasing structure.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70088

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hsi‐fang2026,
  title        = {{When sharing power leads to taking it back: A shift from empowering to directive leadership}},
  author       = {Hsi‐Fang Lai & Shin‐Guang Liang},
  journal      = {Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70088},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

When sharing power leads to taking it back: A shift from empowering to directive leadership

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.