Using diversity for optimizing cycle time for a pick-and-place machine

Mark de Berg et al.

Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-026-09660-xarticle
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract Assigning feeders and nozzles is an important step in the setup of pick-and-place machines. We study this feeder and nozzle assignment problem (FNAP) for a representative machine from Kulicke & Soffa (K&S). The goal is to assign nozzles and feeders so that a given set of printed circuit boards can be produced while minimizing cycle time. The heuristic currently used by K&S reliably finds feasible assignments but performs poorly regarding nozzle exchanges, which are strongly correlated with cycle time. To address this, we propose a novel algorithm that tries to find k feasible assignments that are as diverse as possible, for some parameter $$k>1$$ . By maximizing solution diversity, our approach increases the likelihood of finding initial solutions that can yield shorter cycle times after further optimization. On real-world instances, our algorithm achieves at least half the theoretical maximum diversity in over 70% of cases for $$k \le 10$$ . It also produces assignments with estimated nozzle exchanges roughly half those of the current heuristic in 95% of cases, while reducing the number of instances incorrectly classified as infeasible at only a small cost in runtime.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-026-09660-x

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mark2026,
  title        = {{Using diversity for optimizing cycle time for a pick-and-place machine}},
  author       = {Mark de Berg et al.},
  journal      = {Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-026-09660-x},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Using diversity for optimizing cycle time for a pick-and-place machine

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.