Leave Them to Their Own Devices: When Employee Informal Power in Strategically Core Roles Enhances Organizational Performance

Alexandru V. Roman

American Business Review2025https://doi.org/10.37625/abr.28.2.455-480article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

In this empirical study, I develop theorizing on the conditions under which employees’ informal, competence-based power in strategically core roles enhances organizational performance. I propose that in contexts characterized by high task specialization and interdependence, employees with high informal power positively influence performance through higher motivation and improved coordination. However, this effect is weaker when managers also hold high informal power or emphasize hierarchical structures, as these factors create power conflicts that undermine employees’ informal influence. Conversely, the positive effect is stronger when employees receive negative performance feedback, which they perceive as a challenge to their competence, leading to stronger association between employee informal power and performance. Empirical analyses provide strong support for these propositions, showing that employees’ informal power in strategically core roles can be a key driver of performance improvements, but only under specific organizational conditions.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37625/abr.28.2.455-480

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alexandru2025,
  title        = {{Leave Them to Their Own Devices: When Employee Informal Power in Strategically Core Roles Enhances Organizational Performance}},
  author       = {Alexandru V. Roman},
  journal      = {American Business Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37625/abr.28.2.455-480},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Leave Them to Their Own Devices: When Employee Informal Power in Strategically Core Roles Enhances Organizational Performance

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.