Money, power and free lunches: examining foundation–non-profit power imbalances in the context of capacity-building programmes

Kristina M. Adams Waldorf

Voluntary Sector Review2025https://doi.org/10.1332/20408056y2025d000000037article
AJG 1
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

Financial support from grant-making foundations is seen as a lifeline for UK non-profits, providing security and stability. It may also act as a gateway to capacity-building programmes aimed at improving non-profits’ internal effectiveness. Nevertheless, extant literature recognises how financial grants often create relationships based upon power imbalances, within which foundations occupy the commanding position. Little attempt, however, has been made to understand this tension in respect of capacity-building programmes. This article focuses on the capacity-building programmes of four leading UK foundations. It describes the foundations’ awareness of power imbalances and the perceived consequences of their responses. Data reveal attempts to reduce the impact of the power hierarchy, but suggest strategies are of limited effectiveness: the benefits of capacity building remain linked to non-profit perceptions of foundations’ power. The continuing influence of power imbalances on attempts at foundation–non-profit mutuality is shown and the need for alternative responses highlighted.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/20408056y2025d000000037

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kristina2025,
  title        = {{Money, power and free lunches: examining foundation–non-profit power imbalances in the context of capacity-building programmes}},
  author       = {Kristina M. Adams Waldorf},
  journal      = {Voluntary Sector Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/20408056y2025d000000037},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Money, power and free lunches: examining foundation–non-profit power imbalances in the context of capacity-building programmes

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.