The affective, cognitive, and social benefits of interacting with nature

Nakwon Rim et al.

Journal of Consumer Psychology2025https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1456article
FT50AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.56

Abstract

The surrounding environment influences how people feel, think, and behave. This effect is apparent when examining the multitude of ways interactions with natural environments impact people psychologically. In this Research Dialogue, we discuss work by ourselves and others that demonstrate the benefits of spending time in nature or interacting with natural stimuli, across three psychological domains. First, we discuss affective benefits, such as improved mood and decreased stress and rumination. Then, we discuss cognitive benefits, such as improved working memory. Lastly, we discuss social benefits, such as prosocial and proenvironmental attitudes. We introduce several environmental psychology theories that try to explain why these benefits occur. We present our own work that attempts to determine what characteristics of natural environments cause or are related to these effects by quantifying distinguishing characteristics of natural versus built environments along a variety of dimensions. We then investigate how these dimensions influence the psychological experience in a more natural versus a more built environment. We end by outlining the implications of the benefits of interacting with nature in influencing consumer behaviors.

10 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1456

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nakwon2025,
  title        = {{The affective, cognitive, and social benefits of interacting with nature}},
  author       = {Nakwon Rim et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Consumer Psychology},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1456},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The affective, cognitive, and social benefits of interacting with nature

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.56

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.55 × 0.4 = 0.22
M · momentum0.75 × 0.15 = 0.11
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.