Being Left in the Dark: Leader Work‐Related Secrecy, Psychological Contract Violation, and Employee Discretionary Behavior

Yating Wang et al.

Journal of Organizational Behavior2026https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70084article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In organizations, leaders often have to keep work‐related secrets to protect employees or prevent negative consequences of the information becoming known. Although a growing body of social psychological work examines how keeping secrets can influence one's psychological states, we know relatively little about how leader work‐related secrecy can unintentionally affect employees. By integrating research on secrecy in the social psychology literature with psychological contract theory, the current studies examined how employees' perceptions of leader work‐related secrecy may reduce their leader‐directed discretionary behaviors (i.e., organizational citizenship behaviors and voice) through perceived psychological contract violation. These effects were especially pronounced among employees with a low propensity to trust. Results from two experiments (Study 1: N = 287; Study 2: N = 177) and a multisource multiwave field study (Study 3: N = 364 leader–member dyads) consistently supported our hypothesized model. Implications as well as directions for future research are discussed.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70084

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yating2026,
  title        = {{Being Left in the Dark: Leader Work‐Related Secrecy, Psychological Contract Violation, and Employee Discretionary Behavior}},
  author       = {Yating Wang et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Organizational Behavior},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70084},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Being Left in the Dark: Leader Work‐Related Secrecy, Psychological Contract Violation, and Employee Discretionary Behavior

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.