Morbid curiosity as an adapted motivation to explore ambiguous but survival-relevant stimuli.

David S. March

Psychological Review2026https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000613article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Morbid curiosity, or the seemingly paradoxical drive to engage with aversive or grotesque stimuli, has long puzzled psychologists, who have traditionally framed it as either a form of sensation-seeking or a mechanism for unambiguous threat learning. The current article proposes a novel adaptationist model positioning morbid curiosity as an evolved cognitive mechanism specifically tuned to resolve ambiguity surrounding survival-relevant stimuli. Drawing on evolutionary theory, cognitive psychology, and neurobiological evidence, I argue that morbid curiosity functions primarily as an uncertainty-reduction strategy, motivating individuals to approach ambiguous stimuli to clarify their threat or benefit. Unlike basic emotions such as fear or disgust that typically trigger immediate avoidance, morbid curiosity fosters cautious approach behaviors aimed at gathering survival-critical information. The proposed model thereby reconceptualizes morbid curiosity as an adaptive, ambiguity-oriented cognitive system, offering novel insights into broader questions about human motivation, information-seeking, and adaptive cognition. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000613

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{david2026,
  title        = {{Morbid curiosity as an adapted motivation to explore ambiguous but survival-relevant stimuli.}},
  author       = {David S. March},
  journal      = {Psychological Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000613},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Morbid curiosity as an adapted motivation to explore ambiguous but survival-relevant stimuli.

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.