Free probability, path developments and signature kernels as universal scaling limits

Thomas Cass & William F. Turner

Annals of Applied Probability2026https://doi.org/10.1214/25-aap2240article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Random developments of a path into a matrix Lie group GN have recently been used to construct signature-based kernels on path space. Two examples include developments into GL(N;R) and U(N;C), the general linear and unitary groups of dimension N. For the former, Muça Cirone et al. showed that the signature kernel is obtained via a scaling limit of developments with Gaussian vector fields. The second instance was used by Lou et al. to construct a metric between probability measures on path space. We present a unified treatment to obtaining large N limits by leveraging the tools of free probability theory. An important conclusion is that the limiting kernels, while dependent on the choice of Lie group, are nonetheless universal limits with respect to how the development map is randomised. For unitary developments, the limiting kernel is given by the contraction of a signature against the monomials of freely independent semicircular random variables. Using the Schwinger–Dyson equations, we show that this kernel can be obtained by solving a novel quadratic functional equation. We provide a convergent numerical scheme for this equation, together with rates, which does not require computation of signatures themselves.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1214/25-aap2240

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{thomas2026,
  title        = {{Free probability, path developments and signature kernels as universal scaling limits}},
  author       = {Thomas Cass & William F. Turner},
  journal      = {Annals of Applied Probability},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1214/25-aap2240},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Free probability, path developments and signature kernels as universal scaling limits

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.