Social Science Fiction and Development Studies: Expanding the Imaginative and Methodological Horizon

Laura Camfield & Andy Sumner

European Journal of Development Research2026https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-026-00741-zarticle
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This survey paper examines the potential of social science fiction (SSF), an approach combining social science analysis with narrative and imaginative techniques of science fiction to explore the human consequences of global income inequalities. Although the social sciences’ influence on science fiction is well documented, the reverse, namely the methodological potential of science fiction in the social sciences, remains underexplored, partly due to a lack of systematisation. We pursue three objectives. First, to trace SSF’s intellectual genealogy and defining characteristics; second, to outline how SSF methodological tools could be applied in Development Studies; third, to illustrate SSF use across the social sciences. We argue that SSF could enable scholars to develop new conceptual and theoretical ideas about past, present, and possible future social orders. And when applied systematically, SSF offers rigorous tools for conceptual innovation in analysing emergent, complex, or under-theorised phenomena such as the dynamics of global inequalities in Development Studies.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-026-00741-z

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{laura2026,
  title        = {{Social Science Fiction and Development Studies: Expanding the Imaginative and Methodological Horizon}},
  author       = {Laura Camfield & Andy Sumner},
  journal      = {European Journal of Development Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-026-00741-z},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Social Science Fiction and Development Studies: Expanding the Imaginative and Methodological Horizon

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.