The McCormick Martingale Optimal Transport

Erhan Bayraktar et al.

SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics2026https://doi.org/10.1137/24m1684475preprint
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Martingale optimal transport (MOT) often yields broad price bounds for options, constraining their practical applicability. In this study, we extend MOT by incorporating causality constraints among assets, inspired by the nonanticipativity condition of stochastic processes. This, however, introduces a computationally challenging bilinear program. To tackle this issue, we propose McCormick relaxations to ease the bicausal formulation and refer to it as McCormick MOT. The primal attainment and strong duality of McCormick MOT are established under standard assumptions. Empirically, we apply McCormick MOT to basket and digital options. With natural bounds on probability masses, the average price reduction for basket options is approximately 1.08% to 3.90%. When tighter probability bounds are available, the reduction increases to 12.26%, compared to the classic MOT, which also incorporates tighter bounds. For most dates considered, there are basket options with suitable payoffs, where the price reduction exceeds 10.00%. For digital options, McCormick MOT results in an average price reduction of over 20.00%, with the best case exceeding 99.00%.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1137/24m1684475

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{erhan2026,
  title        = {{The McCormick Martingale Optimal Transport}},
  author       = {Erhan Bayraktar et al.},
  journal      = {SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1137/24m1684475},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The McCormick Martingale Optimal Transport

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.