arbiter
JournalsAccount

Theorizing Access in Global Environmental Governance: A Critical Analysis of COP26 and the COVID-19 Pandemic

Lauren Baker et al.

Global Environmental Politics2026https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.704article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Sites of global environmental governance (GEG), like the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference of Parties (UNFCCC COP), are critical spaces where state and nonstate actors grapple with our planet’s most pressing challenges. Failure to address the unequal impacts of the climate crisis has led scholars and decision makers to call for more transparent, inclusive, and accountable decision-making processes. However, the ever-increasing number and variety of participants has failed to translate into more equitable outcomes. How do institutional structures and relations of power at sites of GEG privilege certain actors and shape participant experiences? This article argues for a retheorization of access in GEG. Based on collaborative event ethnography at COP26, we find that discriminatory design, technological disparities, and recognitional injustice hamper meaningful sustained access, reify power disparities, and undermine inclusion. Integrating critical disability studies, we show how the COVID-19 pandemic drew into sharper focus the distinctions among inclusion, access, and accessibility that structure GEG and can offer lessons for addressing these inequities.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.704

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lauren2026,
  title        = {{Theorizing Access in Global Environmental Governance: A Critical Analysis of COP26 and the COVID-19 Pandemic}},
  author       = {Lauren Baker et al.},
  journal      = {Global Environmental Politics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.704},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Theorizing Access in Global Environmental Governance: A Critical Analysis of COP26 and the COVID-19 Pandemic

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.