Algorithmic Management in Traditional Workplaces: The Case of High vs. Low Involvement Working Practices

Csaba Makó et al.

Journal of Labor and Society2025https://doi.org/10.1163/24714607-bja10182article
ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Abstract Algorithmic management ( am ) has become a key research focus in the sociology of work, especially concerning platform work. However, am tools are also impacting traditional workplaces. This study investigates three main questions: the impact of ai on high vs. low-skilled jobs, its effect on employee’s role, and the formation of collective voices around am , including non-traditional labour relations actors. The context is the Hungarian industrial relations system, known for low union membership and company-level bargaining. The study compares two cases: a medium-sized company in high-value-added business services and a Hungarian subsidiary of a multinational employing warehouse workers. Contrary to literature suggesting am reduces employee autonomy, the study finds its impact complex, decreasing employee’s roles some areas while increasing it in others. Notably, transparency and wage predictability improved. The study also highlights the importance of considering new actors, such as clients and external consultants, in am analysis.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/24714607-bja10182

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{csaba2025,
  title        = {{Algorithmic Management in Traditional Workplaces: The Case of High vs. Low Involvement Working Practices}},
  author       = {Csaba Makó et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Labor and Society},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/24714607-bja10182},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Algorithmic Management in Traditional Workplaces: The Case of High vs. Low Involvement Working Practices

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.