arbiter
JournalsAccount

Arguing in Good Faith about the Constitution: Ideology, Methodology, and Reflective Equilibrium

Fallon & Richard Hoggart

University of Chicago Law Review2017article
ABDC A*
Weight
0.58

Abstract

No abstract available.

4 citations

Cite this paper

@article{fallon2017,
  title        = {{Arguing in Good Faith about the Constitution: Ideology, Methodology, and Reflective Equilibrium}},
  author       = {Fallon & Richard Hoggart},
  journal      = {University of Chicago Law Review},
  year         = {2017},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Arguing in Good Faith about the Constitution: Ideology, Methodology, and Reflective Equilibrium

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.58

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.64 × 0.4 = 0.26
M · momentum0.65 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.