AI in project teams: how trust calibration reconfigures team's collaboration and performance
Viraj Dawarka et al.
What the paper says
Purpose As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in project-based work, trust calibration, ensuring that trust in AI systems is neither excessive nor insufficient, emerges as a key factor for effective collaboration. This study explores how project professionals calibrate trust in AI and how this process influences team collaboration and performance in technology-mediated project environments. Design/methodology/approach Guided by socio-technical systems theory (STS) complemented by adaptive structuration theory (AST), the study draws on 40 semi-structured interviews with project professionals across diverse UK industries. Thematic analysis is used to explore participants' lived experiences of trust calibration, collaboration mechanisms and perceived team performance in AI-supported settings. Findings The result indicates that trust in AI is situational, socially distributed and shaped through ongoing boundary work between human and machine inputs. Enablers such as transparency, role clarity, user experience, cultural norms and system feedback shape calibration processes. These processes, in turn, influenced collaboration (e.g. delegation of oversight and erosion of informal communication) and performance (e.g. metric-driven evaluation and strategic augmentation of human expertise). Originality/value This study contributes to project management and AI adoption research by conceptualising trust calibration as a socio-technical process embedded in team routines, rather than as an individual attitude. It offers an initial conceptual model and a revised conceptual model that links enablers, practices, and outcomes of trust calibration, demonstrating how trust mediates the relationship between AI integration, collaboration and performance. Beyond applying existing frameworks, this research extends STS and AST by developing new theoretical insights into trust calibration as a mechanism linking AI design, collaboration dynamics and project performance. Findings provide practical guidance for designing trust-aware, human-centred AI practices in project environments.
2 citations
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10 |
| M · momentum | 0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.