arbiter
JournalsAccount

Recovering Preferences in College Assignment Problems Under Strategic and Constrained Reports

Allan Hernandez‐Chanto

International Economic Review2026https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.70047article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Many countries around the world use centralized admission systems to assign thousands of students to university programs every year. However, the impact of admission policy changes on students' welfare remains largely unknown. To address this, we propose a novel methodology that recovers students' true preferences in a mechanism where students hold private information and face constraints on the number of options they can submit as preferences. This methodology involves two steps: first, the nonparametric recovery of ordinal preferences using a revealed preference approach based on a concatenation algorithm; and, second, the recovery of cardinal preferences using either a Gibbs sampler estimator or a calibration method. Applying our methodology to administrative data from the University of Costa Rica, we evaluate counterfactual policies and suggest two alternate mechanisms based on an ascending auction and competitive equilibrium prices.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.70047

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{allan2026,
  title        = {{Recovering Preferences in College Assignment Problems Under Strategic and Constrained Reports}},
  author       = {Allan Hernandez‐Chanto},
  journal      = {International Economic Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.70047},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Recovering Preferences in College Assignment Problems Under Strategic and Constrained Reports

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.