arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Solidarity economy. Towards a plural dimension of economic policy

Alessandro Morselli

History of Economic Thought and Policy2025https://doi.org/10.3280/spe2025-002007article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The aim of this note is to attempt to reconsider the more traditional literature on economic policy, concerning the field of the main mechanisms related to macroeconomic policies. This reading, over time, has undergone various critical observations, as well as evolutionary processes derived from political-cultural and institutional dynamics. Thus the debate is not oriented between the choice of liberalism or interventionism, but rather on the economic-political-social objectives of intervention strategies. The correlations between economic content and the principles of modern democracies are questioned, and the issue of economic and social ethics is raised again. Economic policy prescriptions will be reconsidered in the light of their socio-economic complexity, and the result of the reflection will be interpreted by a significant evolution of the dimension of economic policy, considering the dynamics of the solidarity economy.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3280/spe2025-002007

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alessandro2025,
  title        = {{Solidarity economy. Towards a plural dimension of economic policy}},
  author       = {Alessandro Morselli},
  journal      = {History of Economic Thought and Policy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3280/spe2025-002007},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Solidarity economy. Towards a plural dimension of economic policy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.