arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Rethinking Article III Standing in Class Action Consumer Protection Cases Following Spokeo v. Robins

Joshua Scott Olin

University of Miami Business Law Review2017article
ABDC C
Weight
0.32

What the paper says

No abstract available.

1 citation

Cite this paper

@article{joshua2017,
  title        = {{Rethinking Article III Standing in Class Action Consumer Protection Cases Following Spokeo v. Robins}},
  author       = {Joshua Scott Olin},
  journal      = {University of Miami Business Law Review},
  year         = {2017},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Rethinking Article III Standing in Class Action Consumer Protection Cases Following Spokeo v. Robins

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.32

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.15 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.