arbiter
JournalsAccount

The tension between competing statutory obligations in the granting of parental orders: A systematic review of the case law

Lottie Park-Morton

Common Law World Review2026https://doi.org/10.1177/14737795261434019article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article critically examines the judicial approach to granting parental orders following surrogacy under s 54 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 in England and Wales. Whilst the child's welfare is the court's paramount consideration, the statutory requirements of s 54 can, at times, conflict with this principle. Through a systematic review of the case law, this article explores how courts have navigated the tension between fulfilling statutory obligations and guaranteeing the lifelong welfare of the child. It reveals that certain s 54 criteria – such as time limits, the home requirement, and restrictions on payments – have been interpreted flexibly to prioritise welfare, whilst others – including the genetic link requirement and surrogate's consent – remain rigidly applied, occasionally to the detriment of the child's welfare. The analysis highlights the doctrinal and legal incoherence that arises when courts are forced to reconcile competing statutory duties. This tension must be recognised and reflected in any reform of the law. The findings offer valuable insights for jurisdictions considering surrogacy regulation and underscore the need for a coherent legal framework that enables courts to make welfare-driven decisions without statutory compromise.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14737795261434019

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{lottie2026,
  title        = {{The tension between competing statutory obligations in the granting of parental orders: A systematic review of the case law}},
  author       = {Lottie Park-Morton},
  journal      = {Common Law World Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14737795261434019},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The tension between competing statutory obligations in the granting of parental orders: A systematic review of the case law

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.