Strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a vertically differentiated duopoly

Mingqing Xing & Sang‐Ho Lee

International Journal of Economic Theory2026https://doi.org/10.1111/ijet.70017article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

We investigate firms' strategic incentives to adopt environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) in the presence of quality–cost differences within a vertically differentiated duopoly. We find that (i) the low‐quality firm chooses a higher (lower) ECSR level than the high‐quality firm when the low‐quality firm has a relatively more (less) quality–cost advantage than the high‐quality firm, (ii) both firms achieve higher profits by adopting ECSR compared to the case with no ECSR, leading both firms to endogenously choose ECSR regardless of quality–cost differences, and (iii) when both firms can commit to cooperative ECSR, the resulting strategic level is higher than under non‐cooperative ECSR.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijet.70017

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mingqing2026,
  title        = {{Strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a vertically differentiated duopoly}},
  author       = {Mingqing Xing & Sang‐Ho Lee},
  journal      = {International Journal of Economic Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijet.70017},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a vertically differentiated duopoly

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.