arbiter
JournalsAccount

An Australian future for the anti-commandeering doctrine: Might it command operation?

Tristan Taylor & Sarah Murray

Federal Law Review2025https://doi.org/10.1017/fed.2025.10009article
ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Within the Australian Federation to what extent is the Commonwealth Parliament prevented from ‘conscripting’ or ‘commandeering’ State officers for its own purposes? Drawing on the history of commandeering both in the United States and in Australia, this article explores the constraints on the formulation of any Australian-based doctrine in light of recent High Court jurisprudence. This article argues that while the practical scope of any Australian-derived doctrine has been curtailed by the High Court, there is a role for it to play as a ‘per se’ breach of the Melbourne Corporation principle. But to have that effect, its ambit must be confined to situations where there is (i) an administrative duty imposed on (ii) a state statutory office holder or statutory body, where (iii) this has not been acquiesced to by the relevant state legislature or contemplated by the Constitution.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/fed.2025.10009

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tristan2025,
  title        = {{An Australian future for the anti-commandeering doctrine: Might it command operation?}},
  author       = {Tristan Taylor & Sarah Murray},
  journal      = {Federal Law Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/fed.2025.10009},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

An Australian future for the anti-commandeering doctrine: Might it command operation?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.