Response to “Mortality and Science: A Comment on Two Articles on the Effects of Health Insurance on Mortalityâ€

Jacob Goldin et al.

Econ Journal Watch2021article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.26

Abstract

In Goldin, Lurie, and McCubbin (2021), we studied the effect of a randomized outreach experiment to uninsured taxpayers by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). We found that the intervention increased health insurance coverage and reduced middle-age mortality in subsequent years. Kaestner (2021) criticizes our findings as well as a recent study by Miller et al. (2021), which provided evidence that state Medicaid expansions caused reductions in mortality among low-income adults. In neither case does Kaestner provide new empirical evidence or allege an error in analysis—his concerns relate solely to the interpretation and convincingness of the presented results. Here we briefly respond to Kaestner’s criticisms. We conclude that his concerns do not undermine our main empirical finding, which is that the coverage induced by the IRS outreach reduced mortality.

Cite this paper

@article{jacob2021,
  title        = {{Response to “Mortality and Science: A Comment on Two Articles on the Effects of Health Insurance on Mortalityâ€}},
  author       = {Jacob Goldin et al.},
  journal      = {Econ Journal Watch},
  year         = {2021},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Response to “Mortality and Science: A Comment on Two Articles on the Effects of Health Insurance on Mortalityâ€

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.