arbiter
JournalsAccount

Pino G. Audia, Daniella Laureiro Martinez, and Daniel A. Newark (Eds). Decision Making and Problem Solving in Organizations: Assessing and Expanding the Carnegie Perspective AudiaPino G.MartinezDaniella LaureiroNewarkDaniel A. (Eds). Decision Making and Problem Solving in Organizations: Assessing and Expanding the Carnegie Perspective. Frontiers Media, 2024. 181 pp. Open access ebook.

Claus Rerup

Administrative Science Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392261433965article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

No abstract available.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392261433965

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{claus2026,
  title        = {{Pino G. Audia, Daniella Laureiro Martinez, and Daniel A. Newark (Eds). Decision Making and Problem Solving in Organizations: Assessing and Expanding the Carnegie Perspective AudiaPino G.MartinezDaniella LaureiroNewarkDaniel A. (Eds). Decision Making and Problem Solving in Organizations: Assessing and Expanding the Carnegie Perspective. Frontiers Media, 2024. 181 pp. Open access ebook.}},
  author       = {Claus Rerup},
  journal      = {Adm.~Sci.~Q.},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392261433965},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Pino G. Audia, Daniella Laureiro Martinez, and Daniel A. Newark (Eds). Decision Making and Problem Solving in Organizations: Assessing and Expanding the Carnegie Perspective AudiaPino G.MartinezDaniella LaureiroNewarkDaniel A. (Eds). Decision Making and Problem Solving in Organizations: Assessing and Expanding the Carnegie Perspective. Frontiers Media, 2024. 181 pp. Open access ebook.

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.