arbiter
JournalsAccount

Framing the UK audit regulator in the media: The financial reporting council after carillion

Warren Maroun et al.

Journal of Accounting and Public Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2026.107406article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.37

Abstract

• Study Focus : Examines media framing (2018–2023) of Carillion’s failure by the FRC and stakeholder responses. • Blame Avoidance and Stalemate : The FRC initially deflected blame, citing systemic limits and government constraints. • Shift Toward Reform : The FRC later adopted a proactive stance, strengthening enforcement, issuing record fines, and reforming audit firms. • Policy Implications : Despite delayed ARGA reforms, the FRC repositioned itself as a credible agent of regulatory change. • Theoretical Contribution : Advances framing theory by showing how regulatory legitimacy is dynamically shaped through media narratives. This paper examines the interaction between two sets of frames: firstly, how the UK audit regulator (the FRC) framed the failure of a large construction firm (Carillion Plc) and secondly, how stakeholders framed the regulator. An analysis of UK press coverage between 2018 and 2023 reveals how politicians, audit firms, professional bodies, journalists and the FRC itself advance competing narratives in the media which shift over time. Early media coverage captured stakeholders’ views that the FRC was under-resourced, conflicted and toothless. At the same time, the regulator framed Carillion as a threat to its legitimacy, leading to an initial period of inertia. This was not, however, long-lived. As the FRC adopted a stronger public stance, evidenced by increased investigations, fines and proposed structural reforms, stakeholders increasingly framed the regulator as credible and reformed. This transition shows how crises can move from blame and stalemate toward selective accountability and policy experimentation. Our findings demonstrate that regulatory legitimacy is negotiated in public arenas rather than determined solely by institutional design. By conceptualising the media as a space where multiple actors frame and contest regulatory roles, we offer new insights into how crises can be reframed from threats into opportunities, something which can result in regulatory innovation.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2026.107406

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{warren2026,
  title        = {{Framing the UK audit regulator in the media: The financial reporting council after carillion}},
  author       = {Warren Maroun et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Accounting and Public Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2026.107406},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Framing the UK audit regulator in the media: The financial reporting council after carillion

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.