arbiter
JournalsAccount

What Judges Need to Know: The Anti‐Factual Challenge and Judicial Review

Susanne Baer

The Modern Law Review2026https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.70013article
ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Today, there is a ‘knowledge crisis’, informing ‘societies of doubt’. Looked at more closely, we are confronted with attacks on expertise and knowledge, on facts and truth, as one chapter in the autocratic playbook. This challenges the legal system in many ways, be it legislation and other types of regulation, or administration and governance, as well as legal protection by courts. For courts, the challenge is particularly problematic. Judges do not only have to apply law that is more complicated than ever, with legal pluralism ranging from local to global norms. Courts are also, next to independent media, civil society and the academy, targeted by autocrats because they are in their way. Yet in addition, courts must navigate facts in new ways. The article argues that courts are needed as facilitators, curators and communicators of facts, to counter the threats and defend, not least, democracy and justice. Also, legal education must ensure that future lawyers and judges are up to these new callings.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.70013

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{susanne2026,
  title        = {{What Judges Need to Know: The Anti‐Factual Challenge and Judicial Review}},
  author       = {Susanne Baer},
  journal      = {The Modern Law Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.70013},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

What Judges Need to Know: The Anti‐Factual Challenge and Judicial Review

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.