arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Job Demand-Resources (JD-R) model through the eyes of financial advisers: A scoping review

Peter Arthur et al.

Australian Journal of Management2025https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962251350337article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.46

Abstract

This scoping review examines the job demands and resources impacting financial advisers through the lens of the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model. Given the significant challenges facing financial advisers, this review identifies key factors contributing to job stress, satisfaction and turnover in the profession. A comprehensive desktop review and thematic analysis of 53 peer-reviewed articles revealed core job demands such as compliance, emotional strain, and work overload, alongside critical job resources like professional development, support and technology. In addition, personal resources, including self-efficacy and optimism, are explored as potential moderators. The findings offer insights into the complex dynamics within the financial advisory industry, providing a foundation for future studies that may look to enhance job satisfaction and retention. JEL Classification: J28 – Safety, Job Satisfaction, Related Public Policy

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962251350337

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{peter2025,
  title        = {{The Job Demand-Resources (JD-R) model through the eyes of financial advisers: A scoping review}},
  author       = {Peter Arthur et al.},
  journal      = {Australian Journal of Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962251350337},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Job Demand-Resources (JD-R) model through the eyes of financial advisers: A scoping review

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.