The effect of banking relationships on default likelihood

V. Gopikumar et al.

Accounting Theory and Practice2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accoth.2026.100009article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

We study how the number of banking relationships a borrower has influences defaults in India, where lending is dominated by public-sector banks and institutional reforms have reshaped creditor rights. Using a firm-level panel for 2002–2019, we find that each additional bank increases default likelihood by 6–8%, with the effect concentrated among public-sector banks. Sub-sample analyses show that reputation concerns do not offset this association, while greater bank-network connectedness mitigates it. The results remain robust to expanded controls, entropy balancing, and an instrumental variables approach using lagged bank financial characteristics. The relationship becomes more adverse after the 2016 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), with each additional bank increasing default likelihood by an additional 6%.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accoth.2026.100009

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{v.2026,
  title        = {{The effect of banking relationships on default likelihood}},
  author       = {V. Gopikumar et al.},
  journal      = {Accounting Theory and Practice},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accoth.2026.100009},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The effect of banking relationships on default likelihood

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.