A User‐Customizable Hybrid Framework for Targeted Medical Decision‐Making

M. Gabriela Sava et al.

Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis2025https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.70007article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Targeted medical decision-making is a current strategy for addressing the heterogeneity in the patient population, especially when patients' preferences are included in the decision-making process. In this paper, we propose a user-customizable hybrid framework that can be adjusted at the patient group level to target a medical decision process. Our framework provides a flexible design, capable of balancing the gain from the reduction of provider time against the cost of prediction inaccuracy resulting from group customization. The framework combines a descriptive process, used to group the patients based on preference-based subjective features, with a predictive process, which uses objective features to match a new patient with a group. We illustrate our approach by applying it to the colorectal cancer screening problem. The provider chooses what level of trade-off is appropriate, as a function of the acceptable error level. The group customization process allows decision makers to better allocate scarce resources, by potentially shortening the time-consuming process of modelling patients' preferences using individualized stability analysis. The proposed framework might be applied, with minor changes, to various medical decisions, or even to broader provider-user scenarios, in which targeted decision-making that includes user preferences is advantageous.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.70007

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{m.2025,
  title        = {{A User‐Customizable Hybrid Framework for Targeted Medical Decision‐Making}},
  author       = {M. Gabriela Sava et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.70007},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A User‐Customizable Hybrid Framework for Targeted Medical Decision‐Making

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.