When deciding creates overconfidence

Peter J. Boyle et al.

Judgment and Decision Making2025https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2024.39article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.46

Abstract

To the known causes of overconfidence in decisions and judgments, we reveal another source that derives from a bias during the act of decision making. While this bias, the predecisional distortion of information, is well studied, its impact on overconfidence is not. We demonstrate how the distortion of information creates overconfidence in those professionals often regarded as singularly overconfident, entrepreneurs. When these professionals use a sequence of relevant information to make an accept-reject decision about a business opportunity, a cycle of confidence-distortion-confidence builds unjustified confidence in the chosen action – and does so whether that action is to accept or reject the venture. Overconfidence is a well-recognized cause of flawed decision making. Our work demonstrates the paradoxical converse of this claim, that flawed decision making can be a cause of overconfidence.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2024.39

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{peter2025,
  title        = {{When deciding creates overconfidence}},
  author       = {Peter J. Boyle et al.},
  journal      = {Judgment and Decision Making},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2024.39},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

When deciding creates overconfidence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.