Simulating Design Thinking Empathy Interviews Using Generative AI

Gregory N. Stock

Management Teaching Review2026https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981261417648article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Design thinking has become a widely used methodology for innovation in business and other applications and is increasingly being taught in various educational settings. Successful implementation of design thinking depends on developing empathy for users, which refers to the ability to understand how users experience a problem from their perspective. A primary method for developing empathy with users is through in-depth interviews with them. However, in a classroom setting, it is often difficult for students to develop skill in this domain because they are not able to engage in empathy interviews in realistic settings or are reluctant to do so. In this experiential exercise, undergraduate students in a required management major course use generative AI, specifically ChatGPT, to conduct empathy interviews with simulated AI-generated users as part of a series of connected assignments that span all phases of the design thinking process.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981261417648

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{gregory2026,
  title        = {{Simulating Design Thinking Empathy Interviews Using Generative AI}},
  author       = {Gregory N. Stock},
  journal      = {Management Teaching Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981261417648},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Simulating Design Thinking Empathy Interviews Using Generative AI

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.