Design Science Across Disciplines: Building Bridges for Advancing Impactful Business Research

Christoph Seckler et al.

Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-025-00233-6article
AJG 2
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Design science offers a powerful yet underutilized approach for generating practically relevant and rigorous knowledge in business research. Although design science has strong disciplinary roots and has received renewed attention across fields such as information systems, strategy, business ethics & sustainability, entrepreneurship, and accounting, it often remains confined within disciplinary silos. This paper addresses that issue by presenting a comparative, interdisciplinary analysis of design science across five core fields. To foster a broad and inclusive understanding, we draw on the Bridge Model of Design Science, which positions design science as playing a vital bridging role between explanatory business research and business practice. We then examine how various disciplines engage in design science, highlighting unique strengths and shared challenges. By promoting an interdisciplinary dialogue, this paper contributes to a more interdisciplinary design science approach—one even better equipped to tackle the complex challenges facing business and society today. We also envision a future for design science in business research and outline a path toward realizing it.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-025-00233-6

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christoph2025,
  title        = {{Design Science Across Disciplines: Building Bridges for Advancing Impactful Business Research}},
  author       = {Christoph Seckler et al.},
  journal      = {Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-025-00233-6},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Design Science Across Disciplines: Building Bridges for Advancing Impactful Business Research

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.