Emergent servant leadership: A complexity approach to job demands–resources and regulatory focus

Steven Charles Brown et al.

Journal of Management & Organization2026https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2026.10084article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Traditional leadership theories often portray influence as stable traits or behaviors, yet complex organizations require leadership to be understood as an emergent, feedback-driven process that co-evolves with contextual demands and follower motivation. This study conceptualizes servant leadership as a nonlinear, adaptive process rather than a fixed style, integrating Complexity Leadership Theory with the Job Demands Resources model and Regulatory Focus Theory. Servant leadership is theorized as an enabling mechanism through which shifting job demands and resources are translated into employees’ promotion and prevention orientations, shaping person-job fit, satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, initiative, and experienced responsibility. Using a two-phase longitudinal design, Phase 1 tested simple and serial mediation with structural equation modeling, and Phase 2 employed a cross-lagged panel model to examine reciprocal feedback dynamics. Results support a four-path process in which servant leadership differentially activates promotion and prevention focus and participates in ongoing feedback loops.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2026.10084

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{steven2026,
  title        = {{Emergent servant leadership: A complexity approach to job demands–resources and regulatory focus}},
  author       = {Steven Charles Brown et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Management & Organization},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2026.10084},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Emergent servant leadership: A complexity approach to job demands–resources and regulatory focus

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.