Business Process Diagramming and Process Analysis: The Anderson Inc. Logistics Case

Marianne Bradford et al.

Issues in Accounting Education2025https://doi.org/10.2308/issues-2023-098article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Process mapping is a skill employed in auditing, advisory, consulting, and industry. This case requires students to use business process modeling and notation (BPMN) to document the “as is” logistics processes of a fictitious business, Anderson Inc. Students then use the case background information and process map to identify business process issues and suggest solutions that would make the processes more efficient, value added, streamlined, and controlled. The case incorporates various concepts, including systems integration, best of breed versus best in class ERP strategies, logistics processes, and tolerance limits in the three-way match (application controls). The teaching solution includes the BPMN diagram of the processes and suggested solutions to rectify the process problems. This case has broad appeal for faculty teaching a variety of accounting courses that incorporate critical thinking, process mapping skills, and advanced information technology (IT) concepts. Data Availability: Data available upon request.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/issues-2023-098

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{marianne2025,
  title        = {{Business Process Diagramming and Process Analysis: The Anderson Inc. Logistics Case}},
  author       = {Marianne Bradford et al.},
  journal      = {Issues in Accounting Education},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/issues-2023-098},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Business Process Diagramming and Process Analysis: The Anderson Inc. Logistics Case

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.