Working Together: A Governance Perspective of Payments for Water-Based Ecosystem Services Collaboratives

Katrina Miller-Stevens et al.

Public Works Management and Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x261421888article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

As states and regions continue to face challenges related to watershed conservation, watershed stakeholders have become more dependent on collaborative partnerships to solve complex water conservation and environmental problems. These collaborative partnerships often include programs of payments for water-based ecosystem services (PWES). PWES’s are arrangements funded by government or private parties where benefits are offered to ecosystem services providers in exchange for their work on protecting the watershed environment. This paper explores collaborative partnerships of PWES’s in the United States with an emphasis on determining the types of governance structures used by the collaboratives. The study finds that PWES’s primarily engage in interagency and cross-sector governance practices, and less so with grassroots governance practices. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of collaborative partnerships of these programs through the lens of governance structure will enhance local and regional organizations’ abilities to provide the best approach for addressing a particular watershed goal.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x261421888

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{katrina2026,
  title        = {{Working Together: A Governance Perspective of Payments for Water-Based Ecosystem Services Collaboratives}},
  author       = {Katrina Miller-Stevens et al.},
  journal      = {Public Works Management and Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x261421888},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Working Together: A Governance Perspective of Payments for Water-Based Ecosystem Services Collaboratives

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.