Production Function Estimation With Resource Misallocation

Shigang Li & Jiawei Mo

Journal of Applied Econometrics2026https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.70043article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

We show that the proxy variable method fails to yield consistent estimates of production function coefficients in the presence of resource misallocation. This failure arises because unobserved firm‐specific distortions violate the assumptions of scalar unobservability and strict monotonicity. We propose a novel identification strategy that does not rely on these assumptions. Our method is robust to various distortions and production function specifications, and can be extended to accommodate serial correlation in unexpected productivity shocks. Monte Carlo experiments confirm the efficacy of our approach in consistently estimating production function coefficients under resource misallocation. Using a large panel of Chinese manufacturing firms—and employing the share of state‐owned firms as a proxy for industry‐level resource misallocation—we find that estimates obtained via the proxy variable method more closely align with those from our proposed approach when resource misallocation is reduced.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.70043

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shigang2026,
  title        = {{Production Function Estimation With Resource Misallocation}},
  author       = {Shigang Li & Jiawei Mo},
  journal      = {Journal of Applied Econometrics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.70043},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Production Function Estimation With Resource Misallocation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.