Assessing Measurement Invariance With Exploratory Factor Analysis Trees

Nina Straub et al.

European Journal of Psychological Assessment2025https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000898article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Abstract: Measurement invariance (MI) describes the equivalence of measurement models of a latent variable across different groups or time. It is an important prerequisite for subsequent analyses such as group comparisons and diagnostic decisions. Therefore, establishing MI should be a key goal of psychometric research. Exploratory Factor Analysis trees (EFA trees) were developed to address MI already in early stages of measurement scale development. This tool, combining EFA and model based recursive partitioning, performs well in situations with many groups and continuous covariates. The goal of EFA trees is that they are an easy-to-use tool for assessing MI which can be applied both in questionnaire development and prior to group comparisons, especially when no specific hypotheses on the non-invariance between groups exists. To facilitate the application of EFA trees in practice, this paper provides a step-by-step tutorial of the new R package EFA tree that explains how to run the analysis and evaluate the results. A large dataset from a multi-country study is used to illustrate each step, and the results are compared with conventional methods of assessing MI. Advantages and limitations are discussed and further research ideas are presented.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000898

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{nina2025,
  title        = {{Assessing Measurement Invariance With Exploratory Factor Analysis Trees}},
  author       = {Nina Straub et al.},
  journal      = {European Journal of Psychological Assessment},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000898},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Assessing Measurement Invariance With Exploratory Factor Analysis Trees

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.