Looking back: a retrospective narrative analysis of entrepreneurs' failure experiences

Marcus I. Crews

International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ijev.2025.151017article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

While failed ventures are reported as the most likely outcome of an attempt to create a new venture, there is a relative lack of research examining the failure experience from the entrepreneur's perspective. Using narrative analysis to examine entrepreneurs' first-person accounts of past failures, we find entrepreneurs attend to gains and losses within and across financial, operational, psychological, social, and environmental dimensions of performance when reflecting on a venture experience. In addition, structural analysis of entrepreneurial failure narratives reveals narrative arc differences in information disclosure (staging), story advancement (plot progression), and emergence and resolution of conflict (cognitive tension) that vary by type of failure an entrepreneur experiences. The present study contributes to the entrepreneurial failure and cognition literatures by identifying the content of entrepreneurs' personal frameworks for performance assessment and showing patterns in the psychological processing of varied forms of entrepreneurial failure. The study concludes with suggestions for future research.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijev.2025.151017

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{marcus2025,
  title        = {{Looking back: a retrospective narrative analysis of entrepreneurs' failure experiences}},
  author       = {Marcus I. Crews},
  journal      = {International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijev.2025.151017},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Looking back: a retrospective narrative analysis of entrepreneurs' failure experiences

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.