On Corporate Cartels as Common Pool Resources

W. Benedikt Schmal

Journal of Competition Law and Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhaf017article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Governing the complex institution of a corporate cartel is inherently challenging: colluding firms must jointly manage prices and quantities, avoid detection by authorities, and ensure internal discipline against cheating—all without access to legal enforcement. This paper proposes a novel interpretation of cartel excess profits as a common pool resource (CPR), contrasting with the dominant prisoner’s dilemma framework. Following a three-step approach, the paper first establishes how cartel profits meet the criteria of a CPR. Based on that definition, it applies Elinor Ostrom’s Institutional Analysis and Development framework to analyze the internal governance of cartels. Third, it derives policy recommendations that equip competition authorities with new tools to detect and understand collusion. By reframing cartels as self-governed CPR systems, the paper offers fresh insights at the intersection of managerial governance, antitrust law, and industrial organization. This opens new avenues for both theoretical and applied research.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhaf017

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{w.2025,
  title        = {{On Corporate Cartels as Common Pool Resources}},
  author       = {W. Benedikt Schmal},
  journal      = {Journal of Competition Law and Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhaf017},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

On Corporate Cartels as Common Pool Resources

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.