On the optimality of linear residual risk sharing

Jiajie Yang & Wei We

ASTIN Bulletin2025https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2024.37article
AJG 2ABDC A*
Weight
0.46

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the optimal risk sharing problem in the context of peer-to-peer insurance. Using the criterion of minimizing total variance, we find that the optimal risk sharing strategy should take a linear form. Although linear risk sharing strategies have been examined in the literature, our study uncovers a significant finding: to minimize total variance, the linear strategy should be applied to the residual risks rather than the original risks, as commonly adopted in existing studies. By comparing with the existing models, we demonstrate the advantage of the linear residual risk sharing model in variance reduction and robustness. Furthermore, we develop and study a number of new models by incorporating some constraints, to reflect desirable properties required by the market. With those constraints, the optimal strategies turn out to favor market development, such as incentivize participation and guarantee fairness. A relevant model is considered at last, which establishes the connection among multiple optimization problems and provides insights on how to extend the models into a more general setup.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2024.37

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jiajie2025,
  title        = {{On the optimality of linear residual risk sharing}},
  author       = {Jiajie Yang & Wei We},
  journal      = {ASTIN Bulletin},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2024.37},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

On the optimality of linear residual risk sharing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.