Knowledge Bridging: How Acquirers Leverage the Knowledge of Their Targets’ Prior Alliance Partners

Jens‐Christian Friedmann & Korcan Kavuşan

Academy of Management Journal2026https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2024.1203article
FT50UTD24AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Extensive research has examined how firms rely on alliances and acquisitions for sourcing technological knowledge, but we do not know whether acquirers can benefit from the technological knowledge of their targets’ pre-acquisition alliance partners. This study demonstrates that acquirers leverage relational assets inherited from their targets to access knowledge from the targets’ prior partners—knowledge that the target itself did not absorb during the alliance, including knowledge developed by the partner post-alliance. We term this form of knowledge absorption “knowledge bridging.” We reveal that knowledge bridging enables acquirers to more effectively absorb knowledge from their targets’ prior partners, compared to similar firms without prior alliances with the target. Knowledge bridging intensifies with the target’s previous knowledge absorption from its partners. Yet, this effect is weakened by the relatedness between the knowledge bases and business domains of the acquirer and the target’s partners and strengthened by the target’s post-acquisition autonomy.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2024.1203

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jens‐christian2026,
  title        = {{Knowledge Bridging: How Acquirers Leverage the Knowledge of Their Targets’ Prior Alliance Partners}},
  author       = {Jens‐Christian Friedmann & Korcan Kavuşan},
  journal      = {Academy of Management Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2024.1203},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Knowledge Bridging: How Acquirers Leverage the Knowledge of Their Targets’ Prior Alliance Partners

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.