The efficiency of the London Gold Fixing: from gold standard to hoarded commodity (1919–1968)

Fergal A. O’Connor & Brian M. Lucey

Financial History Review2024https://doi.org/10.1017/s0968565024000118article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.51

Abstract

This article presents the newly reconstructed daily gold price from 1919 to 1968 for the world's primary gold market during the London Gold Fixing auction, when gold was the cornerstone of the world's monetary system. We assess whether this market conformed to the Efficient Markets Hypothesis, which posits that prices are unpredictable, or the Adaptive Markets Hypothesis, which posits that a market efficiency will evolve based on changes in the market structure. We find that the Gold Fixing price was inefficient in periods when prices were market-based from 1919 to 1925 and again in the 1930s when private hoarders began to have a significant impact on the market. We find the Gold Fixing was also inefficient during gold standard periods when central bank interventions limited gold's ability to react to new information, despite two episodes where prices rose above the official ceiling.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0968565024000118

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{fergal2024,
  title        = {{The efficiency of the London Gold Fixing: from gold standard to hoarded commodity (1919–1968)}},
  author       = {Fergal A. O’Connor & Brian M. Lucey},
  journal      = {Financial History Review},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0968565024000118},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The efficiency of the London Gold Fixing: from gold standard to hoarded commodity (1919–1968)

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.51

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.