Networked Migrants and De‐Networked Policies—Examining the Nexus of Migration Regimes and Experiences Through a Relational Lens

Alessio D’Angelo & Louise Ryan

Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs2026https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.70046article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Drawing on theory and practice of social network research, this article examines the nexus between networked migration experiences and de‐networked migration policies in countries of arrival. Building upon classical network scholarship and our own contributions to qualitative network research, we show how migration policies in Europe tend to ignore or actively oppose the relational, meso‐level of migrants’ experience. This includes, for example, kinship networks, involving narrow definitions of family and ‘worthiness’. Such approaches, increasingly enforced by governments across the whole policy spectrum, hinder migrants’ social trajectories but also push them to find (networked) ways to resist and circumvent policy regimes, as demonstrated through our case studies of Sub‐Saharan forced migrants in Italy and Afghans in London. By taking a network lens—and working at the intersection of Relational Sociology and Policy Analysis—our argument goes beyond the agency‐versus‐structure binary, exploring the mediating meso‐level of relationality.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.70046

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alessio2026,
  title        = {{Networked Migrants and De‐Networked Policies—Examining the Nexus of Migration Regimes and Experiences Through a Relational Lens}},
  author       = {Alessio D’Angelo & Louise Ryan},
  journal      = {Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.70046},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Networked Migrants and De‐Networked Policies—Examining the Nexus of Migration Regimes and Experiences Through a Relational Lens

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.