Board Gender Diversity and the Portfolio Credit Risk of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs): A Critical Mass Theory Perspective

Md Imran Hossain & Md Aslam Mia

Business and Society Review2026https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70034article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

ABSTRACT While previous studies show that board gender diversity enhances financial performance in traditional financial institutions, little is known about its association with portfolio risk in microfinance institutions (MFIs). This study addresses this gap by examining the impact of board gender diversity on MFI portfolio risk from a critical mass perspective. Using data from the World Bank's MIX Market database covering 1184 MFIs across 98 countries between 2010 and 2018, we employ conventional econometric tools and techniques, including endogeneity‐corrected methods. The results indicate that female board members reduce MFI credit risk. Furthermore, the study confirms that a critical mass of women is essential to realizing this effect. These findings remain robust across subsample analyses (e.g., income levels) and various endogeneity‐corrected techniques (e.g., Hausman–Taylor, generalized two‐stage least squares [G2SLS], and lagged models). The study highlights the importance of integrating gender quotas on MFI boards to minimize portfolio credit risk in the long term, offering valuable implications for policymakers and academics.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70034

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{md2026,
  title        = {{Board Gender Diversity and the Portfolio Credit Risk of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs): A Critical Mass Theory Perspective}},
  author       = {Md Imran Hossain & Md Aslam Mia},
  journal      = {Business and Society Review},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/basr.70034},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Board Gender Diversity and the Portfolio Credit Risk of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs): A Critical Mass Theory Perspective

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.