Algorithmic framework for strategic robotics procurement in academia: An integrated optimization approach using GBWM and VIKOR
Omer Bafail & Adnan Miski
Abstract
This study addresses a critical challenge in strategic decision-making and resource allocation: The unsystematic procurement of single-arm robotic systems for university curricula. This study introduces a dual-stage computational framework designed to transform qualitative pedagogical requirements into a rigorous mathematical optimization model. The proposed method innovatively synthesizes the group best–worst method (GBWM) with the Visekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) algorithm to establish a stabilized decision-making architecture. The novelty of this approach lies in its ability to resolve the inherent 'pedagogical economic paradox' by balancing high-precision technical performance with the stringent budgetary and safety constraints of academic environments, which remain unaddressed in standard industrial models. By leveraging the linear optimization principles of the GBWM, the framework minimizes the maximum absolute deviation in expert consensus, effectively reducing the 'cognitive noise' prevalent in subjective procurement. The integration of VIKOR further enhances the model by using a compromise-ranking logic that penalizes individual criterion regret, ensuring that no single academic priority is sacrificed for the overall performance. The results quantified through this methodology reveal that cost (48.4%) and repeatability (22%) are the primary determinants, a prioritization that diverges significantly from industrial benchmarks. This study provides a replicable algorithmic roadmap that empowers academic institutions to optimize resource management, demonstrating the strategic importance of applied mathematics in bridging the gap between engineering management and educational utility.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.