Adapting sustainable infrastructure practices in Nigeria: an unexplored approach using stakeholders’ perspective
Andrew Ebekozien et al.
What the paper says
Purpose There is increasing responsiveness to the advantages of sustainable infrastructure practices (SIP) when conceptualising urbanised environments. This can be accomplished through processes and practices, but it is challenging, especially in developing countries. This study aims to investigate the perceived issues impeding adapting sustainable infrastructure practices in Nigeria and how to mitigate the issues and enhance the quality of life in a climate-resilient environment. Design/methodology/approach This research adopted a qualitative design and accomplished saturation with 34 interviewees. The interviewees were construction consultants, contracting firms and government policymakers knowledgeable about SIP in Nigeria. This study adopted a thematic analysis and data were analysed manually. Findings Findings identified an absence of an institutional framework to drive the implementation, lax construction digitalisation, lack of funding, tougher government rules and low awareness as the major challenges. They proffered measures to advance SIP in Nigeria and, by extension, improve achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 9 (Industry, innovation and infrastructure) and other construction-related SDGs. Originality/value As part of this study’s value, it will promote sustainable infrastructure practices in construction projects to be environmentally, economically and socially sustainable in Nigeria and other countries with similar encumbrances. The outcome would enhance the construction project’s resilience to provide users with durable, healthy, safe and affordable infrastructure.
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.